← SBS News In Depth
INTERVIEW: Why is President Trump targeting the International Criminal Court? artwork

INTERVIEW: Why is President Trump targeting the International Criminal Court?

SBS News In Depth
06:09
Play episode

Show notes

US President Donald Trump's administration is preparing sanctions against the International Criminal Court as part of a campaign to dismantle the institution created to prosecute people accused of the world's most heinous crimes. So what are the implications? The Trump administration is preparing new sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC), intensifying a long-running US campaign against the world's only permanent court for prosecuting genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and aggression. In this interview, Zoe Paris, Advocacy Coordinator for the Coalition for the International Criminal Court, explains the ICC's role as a court of last resort, stepping in when national governments are unwilling or unable to prosecute the gravest international crimes. Paris argues that Washington's opposition stems from the ICC's willingness to investigate alleged crimes involving US nationals and key allies, particularly Israel. She outlines how proposed sanctions could restrict the provision of services to the court, potentially exposing individuals and companies to severe penalties and creating a chilling effect on organisations that support the ICC's work. The discussion places the current dispute in historical context, noting that US hostility towards the court predates Donald Trump and can be traced through previous administrations, including measures designed to shield US citizens from ICC jurisdiction. However, Paris describes the current efforts to undermine the court as unprecedented in scale and ambition. The interview also examines the broader consequences of sanctions, arguing they would affect not only investigations in Palestine and Afghanistan but also ICC work in Ukraine, Darfur, Libya and the Philippines. Despite these challenges, Paris maintains that the court, human rights organisations and civil society groups remain committed to pursuing justice, accountability and reparations for victims of mass atrocities, and will continue their work regardless of political pressure.

More from this show

More
  1. Retiring Liberal senator Jonno Duniam on his party's challenges

    Is the Liberal Party a sinking ship? Retiring senator Jonno Duniam faces questions on migration, visa delays and his party's future. As he prepares to leave federal politics, Libe…

    19:18
  2. Australian MP injured in alleged attack, Europe rocked by riots

    An alleged attack on well-loved regional MP Helen Haines leaves Australia grappling with the reality of political violence on its shores. We’re joined by SBS’ Canberra bureau to di…

    39:59
  3. What rural American voters want ahead of the midterms

    In the Republican heartland of southwestern Arizona, growing disillusionment with Donald Trump is testing party loyalties ahead of the US midterm elections. Some former supporters…

    06:55
  4. Australia's rising threat of radicalisation

    Authorities and security agencies are warning that online radicalisation is growing and becoming more accessible in the country. Warnings have emerged at a parliamentary inquiry e…

    04:48
  5. NextDC’s 42% plunge puts data centre risks in focus

    Delays to power upgrades at NextDC's Melbourne site forced a sharp downgrade, raising questions for data centre investors. A delay to power upgrades at a Melbourne site sent NextD…

    15:21
  6. Peace at what price? Trump's pressure on Ukraine grows

    Trump ramps up pressure on Ukraine to strike a peace deal with Russia, raising fears Kyiv could be forced into painful concessions. Donald Trump is ramping up pressure on Ukraine…

    05:27
Now Playing